Ash 2014 abstracts online dating graph lorenz curve online dating
: The list has never been debunked, discredited or refuted, as all known criticisms of this list have been rebutted. The existence of a criticism does not make it true, as invalid criticisms of the list have been repeatedly shown to be based on lies, misinformation or strawman arguments. The purpose of the list is to show that peer-reviewed papers exist that support skeptic arguments and to be used as a bibliographic resource to locate these papers. Aeschbach-Hertig rebuttal of "On global forces of nature driving the Earth’s climate. : This is absolutely false, as the list does not discriminate between competing skeptical viewpoints and the purpose of the list is clearly stated, "To provide a bibliographic resource for peer-reviewed papers that support skeptic arguments against ACC/AGW or Alarmism and to prove that these papers exist contrary to claims otherwise." Using this logic the IPCC reports are "cherry picked" because they failed to included most of these papers. Cook et al.'s methodology was so fatally flawed that they falsely classified skeptic papers as endorsing the 97% consensus, apparently believing to know more about the papers than their authors. (2013), the author self-ratings simply confirmed the worthlessness of their methodology, as they were not representative of the sample since only 4% of the authors (1189 of 29,083) rated their own papers and of these 63% disagreed with the abstract ratings. : This is misleading since only a very small minority of scientists have actually expressed a position on AGW from these organizations. 707-714, September 2006)- Vincent Gray Thermocline flux exchange during the Pinatubo event (PDF) (Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 33, Issue 19, October 2006)- D. 66-72, May 2007)- David Bellamy, Jack Barrett Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (PDF) (Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Volume 12, Number 3, pp. Policy statements release by a handful of council members or signed by just the president of a scientific organization can speak for no one other than these few scientists. Chilingar Conflicting Signals of Climatic Change in the Upper Indus Basin (PDF) (Journal of Climate, Volume 19, Issue 17, pp.
Bibliographic resources are not peer-reviewed but curated by an editor. While certain authors on the list cannot be labeled skeptics (e.g. 1059-1072, December 2007)- Olavi Karner Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission (PDF) (Energy Sources, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp. Harold Brooks, Roger Pielke Jr., Roger Pielke Sr.) their paper(s) or results from their paper(s) can still support skeptic's arguments against Alarmism. Fred Singer * Addendum to A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model Predictions (PDF) (Submitted to the International Journal of Climatology, 2007)- David H. "A tour de force list of scientific papers..." - Robert M. Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) or Dangerous Anthropogenic Global Warming (DAGW)]. Environmental Scientist "Wow, the list is pretty impressive ... General Antarctica Arctic Climate Sensitivity Clouds Coral Reefs Deaths Disease Ecological Glaciers Greenland Gulf Stream Hockey Stick Medieval Warm Period Roman Warm Period Ocean Acidification Permafrost Polar Bears Sea Level Species Extinctions Preface: The following papers support skeptic arguments against Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC), Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or Alarmism [e.g. Pilkey Global Climate Change (Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp. 105-121, January 2009)- Tom Quirk Earth's Temperature / CO2 Equilibrium Prior to 1850 (Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. Cropp Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics (PDF) (International Journal of Modern Physics B, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. Tscheuschner * Reply to "Comment on 'Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics' by Joshua B.